On Follow Through Failure
An availability cascade is a self-reinforcing cycle that explains the development of certain kinds of collective beliefs. A novel idea or insight, usually one that seems to explain a complex process in a simple or straightforward manner, gains rapid currency in the popular discourse by its very simplicity and by its apparent insightfulness. Its rising popularity triggers a chain reaction within the social network: individuals adopt the new insight because other people within the network have adopted it, and on its face it seems plausible. The reason for this increased use and popularity of the new idea involves both the availability of the previously obscure term or idea, and the need of individuals using the term or idea to appear to be current with the stated beliefs and ideas of others, regardless of whether they in fact fully believe in the idea that they are expressing.
Aka 'I'm not an expert but that makes sense to me'
The alcohol dehydrogenase allele ADH1B*2 causes a more rapid metabolism of alcohol to acetaldehyde, and reduces risk for alcoholism;[74] it is most common in individuals from East Asia and the Middle East. The alcohol dehydrogenase allele ADH1B*3 also causes a more rapid metabolism of alcohol. The allele ADH1B*3 is only found in some individuals of African descent and certain Native American tribes. African Americans and Native Americans with this allele have a reduced risk of developing alcoholism.[74][90][91] Native Americans, however, have a significantly higher rate of alcoholism than average; risk factors such as cultural environmental effects e.g. trauma have been proposed to explain the higher rates.[92][93]
The police announced the completion of their investigation three weeks after the incident, saying that Anning would not be charged as his actions had been in self-defence, and that Connolly had received an official caution. However, a man who allegedly kicked Connolly several times while he was held down was charged with assault.[67]
The prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, urged us to start at the beginning. “We start with the youngest men, little boys, our sons and grandsons, which makes sure that they respect their mothers and their sisters and all of the women in their lives,” he told Parliament.Turnbull’s words struck at the core of an emotive debate. To stop other women from being killed, we didn’t need more CCTV cameras or police on the streets and we didn’t need women to take more steps to protect themselves when out at night – we needed to tackle the misogyny that lurks beneath so much violence against women.
What I noticed was that while her killer was in police custody within 24 hours of the crime, the attention/interest and opining was at its highest when the general public knew the least. By the sentencing of her killer, there was I would guesstimate close to no interest, when we knew the most. Checking on google trends, this observation holds true with the September 2019 interest in Eurydice Dixon charting at 3, around the time media would have been covering the sentencing of her killer, as compared to 100 in the immediate aftermath of her murder. I'm not sure how to read google trends but it seems pretty safe to assume about 3% of people actually followed up on that case...
...at least among the general public, the previously quoted article offers me reassurance that we have institutions and professionals that invest the time and energy to follow a case through. In the interest of honest discourse, here is a write up post sentencing that asserts a hatred of women as the motive.
Mike Brown's Death and Investigation Outcome
Mike Brown's death in Ferguson, after he was shot by a Police Officer is salient with me, for more shameful reasons. At the time, I was perplexed as to why the Ferguson police department didn't throw the officer under the bus. Something like 'You had a bad day son, and you shot an unarmed man' vis-a-vis he just wasn't good at his job, so cut him loose and spare the riots.
I was wrong, but much like the case above, the interest peak was when we knew the least, and is relatively non-existent by the time the investigation is done.
There is, in a rare example of contemporary theatre that is excellent and innovative a play available in its entirety on youtube called 'Ferguson Verbatim'
But if you don't feel like saddling up for a virtual trip to the theatre or would rather watch a true crime Netflix documentary tonight, here's a summary from Wikipedia:
A grand jury was called and given extensive evidence from Robert McCulloch, the St. Louis County Prosecutor. On November 24, 2014, McCulloch announced the St. Louis County grand jury had decided not to indict Wilson.[11] In March 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice reported the conclusion of its own investigation and cleared Wilson of civil rights violations in the shooting. It found forensic evidence supported Wilson's account, and that witnesses who corroborated the officer's account were credible. Witnesses who had incriminated him were found to be not credible, with some admitting they had not directly seen the events.[12][13] The U.S. Department of Justice concluded that Wilson shot Brown in self-defense.[14][15]
A new St. Louis prosecutor, Wesley Bell, spent five months in 2020 reviewing the case with an eye to charging Wilson with either manslaughter or murder. In July, Bell announced he would not charge Wilson with any crime.[16]
Mike Brown however comes with a Follow up+ though, there's a documentary called 'What Killed Michael Brown' that though I haven't seen, from interviews with the film makers and Coleman Hughes, leads me to understand the documentary covers the effects on Ferguson the town of the whole debacle following Michael Brown's death.
Libertarians, Anti-Lockdown camp and the Swedish Model
Last year during the most severe Melbourne Covid lockdown, I really noticed this failure to follow up in full effect, revealing many interlocutors and pundits to be dishonest and disingenuous.
So many people wanting the economy opened up looked to Sweden. Betting Sweden's more free-market approach to Covid would vindicate them. Here's how that turned out:
The Swedish government's approach has received considerable criticism. Some Swedish scientists had called for stricter preventative measures throughout the pandemic,[8] and an independent commission (Coronakommissionen) found that Sweden failed to protect care home residents due to the overall spread of the virus in society.[9] In December 2020 both King Carl XVI Gustaf and Prime Minister Stefan Löfven admitted they felt that Sweden's COVID-19 strategy had been a failure due to the large number of deaths.[10]
Following agency advice, the government has passed legislation limiting freedom of assembly by temporarily banning gatherings of over 50 individuals, banning people from visiting nursing homes, and physically closing secondary schools and universities. Primary schools have remained open, in part to avoid healthcare workers staying home with their children.
The Public Health Agency issued recommendations to: if possible, work from home; avoid unnecessary travel within the country; engage in social distancing; and for people above 70 to stay at home, as much as possible. Those with even minimal symptoms that could be caused by COVID-19 are recommended to stay home. The karensdag, or initial day without paid sick-leave, has been removed by the government and the length of time one can stay home with pay without a doctor's note has been raised from 7 to 21 days.
The pandemic has put the Swedish healthcare system under severe strain, with tens of thousands of operations being postponed throughout the year, and only emergency and COVID-related care being available during a surge in the winter.
and:
As of 18 March 2021, there have been 744,272 confirmed cumulative cases and 13,262 deaths with confirmed COVID-19[3] in Sweden, with Stockholm County being the most affected (during first wave).[1][12] Sweden has several times the number of confirmed cases and deaths of all neighboring Scandinavian countries; but several other European countries have higher rates of confirmed cases and deaths per capita than Sweden. Close to half of those who died had been living at nursing homes,[13][14][15] a proportion which is similar to other European countries.[16]
And yet, those still advocating abandoning restrictions appear to simply abandon the Swedish argument.
Atlanta Spa Shootings and Future Follow Up
Bringing us into the present day, or at least present week, where the latest mass shooting is being debated at least in the American press. Speculation is happening, truths are being asserted. Particularly revolving around the role race played in the motives of the Suspect.
As of writing the early stages of the investigation have turned up mostly evidence that an internal struggle between sex and religiosity are the major motive. Less evidence, but not none, has turned up that the suspect harbors anti-Asian sentiments.
There's a debate that I would personally evaluate as non-controversial that race plays a role through fetishization of Asian women, this could easily be substantiated through suspects browser history, and a public debate on depictions of Asian women in media is no doubt a constructive outcome that can follow from this.
There's also a debate that appears to take on the character that race is the primary motivator and the 'personal struggle with sex addiction' is a smokescreen. I am less confident that this notion will be born out in a competent investigation, there is already evidence to support the sex-religiosity conflict that would needs must be excluded and evidence to be found. I am open to that evidence surfacing, but not confident it will. I suspect this narrative currently being asserted though, will fall victim to the failure to follow up effect, and that it may already be a product of an availability cascade.
Tentative Conclusion I will no Doubt Follow Up Some Day
This post is more about the failure to follow up effect, I picked high profile examples where the initially asserted narrative was not supported by the facts found in the investigation. As at the beginning of this post, once again it does not mean the narrative doesn't hold anywhere else (except maybe in the findings regarding violent videogames).
The conclusion is really that I am persuaded this effect exists, specifically > 1. something happens that captures public interest > 2. The public demands an answer, explanation. > 3. A narrative is asserted without being substantiated. > 4. Members of the public are satisfied with 'makes sense to me.' > 5. The public loses all interest in confirming/disconfirming the narrative.
Add to that the availability cascade and because the narrative wasn't followed up to see if it was true the last time, the same narratives get a second airing, which if they prove generally unsubstantiated mean it jeopardizes the chances of getting a correct diagnosis and fixing the problem.
Either way, the Failure to Follow Up effect is probably a lesser concern than good old usual suspect: confirmation bias, and you know motivated reasoning. It may though be significant when thinking about media reform, and one of the more if not most significant domains I'm virtually certain it applies is in the extremely shady business of financial and economic forecasting.
I feel it interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment